The political play of Shakespeare’s Coriolanus is depicted in Ancient Rome. It is set in a time where the Roman Empire transitioned from a monarchy to a democracy thus displaying a major power struggle as some were able to adapt better than others. At the start of the play the plebeians (citizens) are protesting in the streets while the ruling class has all the power. Tullus Aufidius, leader of the Volscian army wages war on Rome and Coriolanus known as the great war hero goes and defeats him. This play is significant in the way that the hero is portrayed. Rather than him being a noble, selfless war hero, Coriolanus is characterized as power-hungry, arrogant and proud which makes him a great warrior but leads to his downfall. Even though he is characterizes negatively, the audience starts feels empathy towards the protagonist as it becomes clear that his personality is a reflection of his mother’s power over him as she influences Coriolanus with her harsh ideologies. Shakespeare uses animal imagery and specifically the metaphor of a dragon to characterize the changing Coriolanus as by the end the play, Coriolanus is like a “lonely dragon”, meaning he is incapable of living among Roman society. displaying how he his beliefs change to not being able to rule Rome. Menenius has power over the plebeians as he is first successful in convincing them to vote for Coriolanus as consul. His downfall is believing he has power over Coriolanus as Shakespeare describes their relationship as being like a father and son. This however is then proven to be untrue as near the end of the play the only person Coriolanus listens to is his mother, Volumnia. The power struggle for Rome is later to be taken by the plebeians as they are the majority, but their opinions are shown to be heavily swayed due to the different opinions of people influencing them. This is a foil to Coriolanus as they are able to adapt to the change but Coriolanus fails to do so. Coriolanus is a tragic hero who demonstrates that power driven by pride and arrogance does not lead to success.
How and why is a particular social group represented in a certain way? The article "For Women Under 30, Most Births Occur Outside of Marriage" was written for the New York times to depict single motherhood as a negative thing that increases poverty rates and the suffering of emotional and behavior problems in children. Bias by omission and bias through statistics is used throughout to marginalize single moms. The authors have presented the social group in a bad light to support their own personal conservative ideologies. This is unfair as it is the job of journalists to be as unbiased as possible in order to highlight the other side of the story. How could the text be read and interpreted differently by two different readers? The article "For Women Under 30, Most Births Occur Outside of Marriage" is about the negative impacts of single motherhood. The author uses bias in order to mirror his conservative ideologies. This restricts the reader only to the i...
Comments
Post a Comment